what is this campaign about?

In November 24 2004, a video clip of a two teenagers engaged in intimate sexual acts was put on sale in a popular Indian auction site, Bazee.com. Later, it transpired that this clip was originally a multi-media messaging (MMS) clip that was recorded by a 16-year-old schoolboy of him and his girlfriend, using the built-in camera on his digital telephone. He circulated the image in school through MMS, and both students were expelled when found out. Meanwhile, a 23-year-old engineering student who obtained a copy of this allegedly put it on sale in the auction site. As word spread and the story hit the front pages of Indian newspapers, the student, the schoolboy and the owner of the Internet site were all arrested. As of January 2005, the case is still on trial.

In 2005, APC WNSP developed research papers that look at the connection between information communications technology (ICTs) and violence against women (VAW). From sharing the findings with women's rights and communication rights advocates in different spaces, we found this to be an issue that compels further attention and deeper engagement.

This is especially since many stakeholders with access to decision-making powers in policy processes such as the World Summit on Information Society (WSIS), have begun to argue on regulation of the internet by asserting protection of women from harm in terms of pornography. The problem with this is the conspicuous absence of women’s own experiences and perspectives from these debates.

The root cause of VAW lies in unequal power relations between men and women in almost all facets of life. The field of ICTs faces the same gender disparity. As a result, digital spaces like the internet, broadcast and telecommunications have become defined and developed according to dominant perspectives of masculinities.

This means that VAW that happened in physical spaces like the home and streets, are now also taking new forms and occurring in digital spaces. For example, domestic violence abusers have used tools like spyware and GPS to track and control their partner's mobility.

APC WNSP believes that both ICTs and VAW affect our capacity to completely enjoy our human rights and fundamental freedoms. Our right to move freely without harassment or threats to safety also applies to digital spaces.

This 16-day campaign aims to engage greater participation by all civil society, especially grrls and women ICT-users, to think about this issue in diverse contexts and realities. By calling for all users to reclaim control over technology, we are asking for the right to define, access, use and shape ICTs for its potential to transform power relations, towards a vision and reality of equality.

What is this action?

  • A collaborative campaign to reclaim information & communications technologies (ICTs) to end violence against women (VAW).
  • A call to everyone - especially grrls and women - to take control of ICTs and consciously use it to change power relations between men and women.
  • For 16 Days (Nov 25 – Dec 10), to enable users to employ ICTs for activism against VAW.

Why Take Back The Tech?

  • Creating digital spaces that protects everyone’s right to move freely, without harassment or threat to safety (echoing "Take Back The Night" campaigns).
  • Realising our rights to shape, define, participate, use & share knowledge, information and ICTs.
  • Addressing the intersections between communication rights and women’s human rights, especially violence against women.
  • Recognising women’s historical and critical participation and contribution to the development of ICTs (e.g. Ada Lovelace, Grace Hopper...)

What are the goals of this action?

  • Build knowledge on how VAW is connected with ICTs, based on diverse experiences and realities.
  • Support and promote local actions, priorities and advocacy issues on VAW & ICTs in different spaces and contexts.
  • Collaboratively create strategies on using ICTs tactically to counter VAW.
  • Changing the landscape, potential & paradigm of ICTs through active participation.
  • To facilitate movement building on the human rights of women in relation to the field of ICTs.

Absconding Rapist uses weblogs to further victimize him victim

Sajid Huq, a Columbia PhD student,was arrested on charges of rape, assault and battery (among others) against his wife in September. He is facing 10 felony charges and 2 misdemeanors. He skipped his arraignment in November but he is active on the internet, where he has started his own blog to try his hand at character assassination of his wife and her family. In addition his family has filed false charges against the victim and her family in Bangladesh.
THIS is exactly the reason why victims remain silent in the face of abuse by their husbands. It's sad to see Sajid Huq freely using the Internet to further victimize Nadine Murshid, his wife.

this piqued my interest. did

this piqued my interest. did a google search. didn't realise it was happening. so there is a facebook cause in support of her, and a blog to victimise her.

maybe this could be something that kaBLOGGERS can blog about no?

http://mightyminnow.wordpress.com/2007/11/16/what-is-a-womans-worth-meas...

Not true

The blog is to expose the fact she committed bigamy and fraud. Please get the story right.

The Real Picture

The above comments are completely untrue. The absconding criminal is Nadine Murshid, and her sister Navine Murshid and their parents Firdous Murshid and Subrana Motki Murshid. The case is a bigamy and fraud case and the Murshids may face up to 25 years in prison. Which is why they are trying to spread lies and misinformation to confuse people. There is a warrant out against them in their own country, Bangladesh, and they are abscoding arrest. Here are newspaper articles about the matter:

http://www.thebangladeshtoday.com/archive/October%2007/27-10-2007.htm

http://nation.ittefaq.com/issues/2007/10/26/news0304.htm

Here is a webblog that gives the right picture:

http://sajidnadine.wordpress.com/

The abuse of technology is happening in the hands of Nadine Murshid, who is using her friends like Shakib Chowdhury to run a defamation campagin against Sajid Huq.

Sajid Huq did not commit a single crime against Nadine Murshid. Nadine Murshid had two husbands and in order to get a visa in America, she married Sajid and escaped from her other husband in Bangladesh, Ershad Zaman. But when Sajid found out, she framed Sajid so she could get a greencard using the asylum quota for victims of domestic abuse that the US Government contains.

Further info

Abdul Kargbo describes how Nadine has been further victimized by Sajid Huq. Definitely a must read for all who have heard of this case. Very sad that such violence still exists in societies that we claim are above and beyond such things.

http://mightyminnow.wordpress.com/2007/12/11/lessons-learned-now-its-tim...